This is a UMC Clergy. He went on sabbatical in July 2006 but could not return to his church. He is married and was involved with a married woman. July 2007 he was allowed to go back to his church. When he went back to his church, he was still married, still involved with the married woman and started a relationship with his secretary. He was allowed to retire when the General Conference found out about this man's abuse of his power and his abuse of women. Is this fair? Should this man be allowed to be called a Reverend? Please do not be fooled by clergy like this?
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Rev Dr James McCray Jr:
This is a UMC Clergy. He went on sabbatical in July 2006 but could not return to his church. He is married and was involved with a married woman. July 2007 he was allowed to go back to his church. When he went back to his church, he was still married, still involved with the married woman and started a relationship with his secretary. He was allowed to retire when the General Conference found out about this man's abuse of his power and his abuse of women. Is this fair? Should this man be allowed to be called a Reverend? Please do not be fooled by clergy like this?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment